268-270 n_Word–Concept Association Survey (tablet property)
I. Informed Consent
This study aims to explore the relationship between language and cultural cognition. All your responses will be kept strictly confidential and used only for academic research purposes. You have the right to withdraw from the survey at any time. Submitting this questionnaire means you have read the information above and voluntarily agree to participate in this study.
II. Background Information
What is your gender
Male
Female
Other / Prefer not to say
What is your current level of education
First-year undergraduate
Second-year undergraduate
Third-year undergraduate
Fourth-year undergraduate
Master's student
Doctoral (PhD) student
What is your birth year (Please enter a four-digit year, e.g., 2001)
III. Language Background and Proficiency
What is your native language
Chinese
English
Other (please specify)
How would you rate your proficiency in English
Very fluent (able to read, write, and speak with ease)
Fairly fluent (can handle most daily communication and academic reading)
Moderate (can manage basic communication with some limitations)
Not fluent or barely able to use English
How would you rate your proficiency in Chinese (You may refer to HSK levels if applicable)
Very fluent (e.g., equivalent to HSK 6; able to read, write, and speak with ease)
Fairly fluent (e.g., HSK 5–6; can handle most daily communication and academic reading)
Moderate (e.g., HSK 4; can manage basic communication with some limitations)
Not fluent or barely able to use Chinese (e.g., HSK 3 or below)
IV. Familiarity with Journey to the West
How familiar are you with Journey to the West (《西游記》)
I have read the original Chinese version or a full-length adaptation and am familiar with the content
I know the story and characters through TV shows, comics, games, or other media
I have heard of Journey to the West, but don’t know much about the story
I have no idea what Journey to the West is
V. Survey Instructions
You will be asked to complete 143 rating items. For each item, you will see a word (e.g., practicing) followed by an example sentence that shows how the word is used in context. Please rate how relevant the word is to the question, based on its meaning in the sentence. This survey includes a few attention check questions. Please read each word and sentence carefully and answer attentively.
1. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something that you can easily see? (For example: "moon" is highly relevant to this question, because the moon is a physical object you can easily see. In contrast, "disease" might be somewhat relevant, because disease is something that you may or may not be able to see.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something that you can easily see? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visually light or bright? (For example: "snow" is highly relevant to this question, because snow is very bright. In contrast, "banana" might be somewhat relevant, because bananas have a somewhat light color.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visually light or bright? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
3. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visually dark? (For example: "coal" is highly relevant to this question, because coal is very dark. In contrast, "mud" might be somewhat relevant, because mud has a somewhat dark color.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visually dark? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
4. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining color? (For example: "grass" is highly relevant to this question, because grass has a very characteristic color. In contrast, "pony" might be somewhat relevant, because the color of ponies is somewhat variable.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining color? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
5. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining visual texture or surface pattern? (For example: "tiger" is highly relevant to this question, because tigers have a very characteristic striped surface pattern. In contrast, "pond" might be somewhat relevant, because the surface of a pond has a subtle visual texture.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining visual texture or surface pattern? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
6. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as large in size? (For example: "volcano" is highly relevant to this question, because volcanos are very large in size. In contrast, "camel" might be somewhat relevant, because camels are somewhat large in size.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as large in size? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as small in size? (For example: "speck" is highly relevant to this question, because specks are very small in size. In contrast, "rabbit" might be somewhat relevant, because rabbits are somewhat small in size.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as small in size? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a lot of visually observable movement? (For example: "tornado" is highly relevant to this question, because tornados show a lot of observable movement. In contrast, "clock" might be somewhat relevant, because clock parts move, but not very noticeably.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a lot of visually observable movement? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
9. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as movement like that of a living thing? (For example: "monkey" is highly relevant to this question, because monkeys show movements that are very typical of a living thing. In contrast, "snail" might be somewhat relevant, because snails are alive and move, but not like typical animals.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as movement like that of a living thing? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
10. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visible movement that is fast? (For example: "motorcycle" is highly relevant to this question, because motorcycles typically move very fast. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because cats sometimes move fast.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visible movement that is fast? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
11. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visible movement that is slow? (For example: "snail" is highly relevant to this question, because snails typically move very slowly. In contrast, "cow" might be somewhat relevant, because cows usually move somewhat slowly.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visible movement that is slow? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
12. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining visual shape or form? (For example: "giraffe" is highly relevant to this question, because giraffes have a very characteristic visual shape. In contrast, "chocolate" might be somewhat relevant, because chocolate can come in a variety of shapes.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining visual shape or form? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
13. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visually complex? (For example: "motorcycle" is highly relevant to this question, because motorcycles have many visually observable parts. In contrast, "skateboard" might be somewhat relevant, because skateboards have relatively few observable parts. ) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as visually complex? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
14. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a human or human-like face? (For example: "nurse" is highly relevant to this question, because nurses have human faces. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because cat and human faces share some similar features.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a human or human-like face? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
15. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as human or human-like body parts? (For example: "nurse" is highly relevant to this question, because nurses have human body parts. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because cats have some body parts that are similar to humans.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as human or human-like body parts? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something that you could easily recognize by touch? (For example: "toothbrush" is highly relevant to this question, because a toothbrush is something you can touch and recognize by feel. In contrast, "onion" might be somewhat relevant, because an onion might be a little hard to recognize by touch alone.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something that you could easily recognize by touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
17. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something associated with temperature? (For example: "fire" is highly relevant to this question, because fire often evokes a strong sense of temperature. In contrast, "hamburger" might be somewhat relevant, because hamburgers are usually warm to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something associated with temperature? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
18. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as hot to the touch? (For example: "fire" is highly relevant to this question, because fire has a very hot temperature. In contrast, "hamburger" might be somewhat relevant, because hamburgers are usually warm to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as hot to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
19. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as cold to the touch? (For example: "ice" is highly relevant to this question, because ice has a very cold temperature. In contrast, "knife" might be somewhat relevant, because knives are usually cool to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as cold to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
20. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something associated with tactile texture? (For example: "silk" is highly relevant to this question, because silk has a very soft and smooth texture. In contrast, "wood" might be somewhat relevant, because wood usually has a noticeable grain and surface texture to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something associated with tactile texture? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
21. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a smooth texture to the touch? (For example: "silk" is highly relevant to this question, because silk is very smooth to the touch. In contrast, "cardboard" might be somewhat relevant, because cardboard is fairly smooth.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a smooth texture to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
22. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a rough texture to the touch? (For example: "stubble" is highly relevant to this question, because beard stubble is very rough to the touch. In contrast, "brick" might be somewhat relevant, because the surface of a brick is fairly rough.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a rough texture to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
23. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as light in weight? (For example: "balloon" is highly relevant to this question, because toy balloons are very light in weight. In contrast, "apple" might be somewhat relevant, because apples are fairly light in weight.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as light in weight? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
24. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as heavy in weight? (For example: "anvil" is highly relevant to this question, because anvils are very heavy in weight. In contrast, "bookcase" might be somewhat relevant, because bookcases are fairly heavy, but typically can be lifted with effort.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as heavy in weight? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
25. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as pain or physical discomfort? (For example: "headache" is highly relevant to this question, because headaches are associated with a lot of pain and physical discomfort. In contrast, "pin" might be somewhat relevant, because a pin might accidentally cause pain.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as pain or physical discomfort? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
26. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something that you can easily hear? (For example: "siren" is highly relevant to this question, because sirens are easy to hear. In contrast, "stream" might be somewhat relevant, because streams make sounds but are somewhat difficult to hear.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as something that you can easily hear? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
27. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a loud sound? (For example: "explosion" is highly relevant to this question, because explosions make very loud sounds. In contrast, "argument" might be somewhat relevant, because arguments can sometimes be loud.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a loud sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
28. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a low-pitched sound? (For example: "tuba" is highly relevant to this question, because tubas make very low sounds. In contrast, "cow" might be somewhat relevant, because cows make fairly low-pitched sounds.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a low-pitched sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
29. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a high-pitched sound? (For example: "whistle" is highly relevant to this question, because whistles make very high sounds. In contrast, "rooster" might be somewhat relevant, because roosters make fairly high-pitched sounds.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a high-pitched sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
30. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or recognizable sound or sounds? (For example: "rooster" is highly relevant to this question, because roosters make very recognizable sounds. In contrast, "truck" might be somewhat relevant, because trucks make somewhat recognizeable sounds.) To help us confirm that you're reading the questions carefully, please select option 3 for this question. To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or recognizable sound or sounds? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
31. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or recognizable sound or sounds? (For example: "rooster" is highly relevant to this question, because roosters make very recognizable sounds. In contrast, "truck" might be somewhat relevant, because trucks make somewhat recognizeable sounds.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or recognizable sound or sounds? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
32. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a musical sound? (For example: "orchestra" is highly relevant to this question, because orchestras make musical sounds. In contrast, "windchimes" might be somewhat relevant, because windchimes make a somewhat musical sound.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a musical sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
33. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that talks? (For example: "actress" is highly relevant to this question, because actresses very often talk. In contrast, "baby" might be somewhat relevant, because babies make babbling noises that sound similar to speech.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that talks? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
34. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining taste? (For example: "banana" is highly relevant to this question, because bananas have a very characteristic taste. In contrast, "potato" might be somewhat relevant, because potatoes have a subtle but recognizable taste.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining taste? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
35. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining smell or smells? (For example: "orange" is highly relevant to this question, because oranges have a very characteristic smell. In contrast, "dirt" might be somewhat relevant, because dirt has a subtle but recognizable smell.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a characteristic or defining smell or smells? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
36. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as actions using the face, mouth, or tongue? (For example: "whistle" is highly relevant to this question, because whistles are objects you use with your face and mouth. In contrast, "candle" might be somewhat relevant, because candles are things you sometimes blow out.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as actions using the face, mouth, or tongue? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
37. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as actions using the arm, hand, or fingers? (For example: "keyboard" is highly relevant to this question, because keyboards are objects you use with your hands and fingers. In contrast, "shoe" might be somewhat relevant, because wearing shoes requires relatively little hand or arm involvement.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as actions using the arm, hand, or fingers? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
38. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as actions using the leg or foot? (For example: "pedal" is highly relevant to this question, because pedals are objects you work with your leg and foot. In contrast, "elevator" might be somewhat relevant, because using an elevator requires only minimal leg and foot involvement.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as actions using the leg or foot? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
39. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a physical object YOU have personal experience using? (For example: "fork" is highly relevant to this question, because forks are objects you likely have a lot of personal experience using. In contrast, "saw" might be somewhat relevant, because you probably have some experience using a saw.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a physical object YOU have personal experience using? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
40. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a fixed location, as on a map? (For example: "library" is highly relevant to this question, because libraries and other buildings have a very fixed location. In contrast, "bush" might be somewhat relevant, because bushes have a fixed location but are not distinctive enough to be marked on maps.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a fixed location, as on a map? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
41. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as changes in location along a particular direction or path? (For example: "rocket" is highly relevant to this question, because rockets follow a typical path upward into the sky. In contrast, "helicopter" might be somewhat relevant, because helicopters might move along various horizontal and vertical paths.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as changes in location along a particular direction or path? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
42. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a particular setting or physical location? (For example: "oven" is highly relevant to this question, because thinking of an oven might bring to mind a kitchen. In contrast, "cup" might be somewhat relevant, because thinking of a cup might bring to mind a variety of different locations.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a particular setting or physical location? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
43. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as often physically near to you (within easy reach) in everyday life? (For example: "wristwatch" is highly relevant to this question, because your watch is physically very near to you in everyday life, assuming you wear a watch. In contrast, "pen" might be somewhat relevant, because you may have a pen near you when you work.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as often physically near to you (within easy reach) in everyday life? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
44. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as movement toward or into you? (For example: "food" is highly relevant to this question, because food is something you typically bring toward and into you. In contrast, "cup" might be somewhat relevant, because a cup is something you typically bring toward you.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as movement toward or into you? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
45. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as movement away from or out of you? (For example: "vomit" is highly relevant to this question, because vomit is something that comes out of and away from you. In contrast, "key" might be somewhat relevant, because a key is something you typically move away from you.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as movement away from or out of you? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
46. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a specific number or amount? (For example: "week" is highly relevant to this question, because the word week indicates 7 days. In contrast, "glove" might be somewhat relevant, because the word glove might make you think of 5 fingers.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a specific number or amount? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
47. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event or occurrence that occurs at a typical or predictable time? (For example: "lunch" is highly relevant to this question, because lunch is an event that typically occurs around noon. In contrast, "holiday" might be somewhat relevant, because holidays occur on somewhat predictable dates.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event or occurrence that occurs at a typical or predictable time? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
48. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event that has a predictable duration, whether short or long? (For example: "movie" is highly relevant to this question, because movies have a fairly standard duration. In contrast, "concert" might be somewhat relevant, because concerts are somewhat variable in duration.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event that has a predictable duration, whether short or long? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
49. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event that lasts for a long period of time? (For example: "life" is highly relevant to this question, because peoples' lives typically last a long time. In contrast, "war" might be somewhat relevant, because wars often last for several years.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event that lasts for a long period of time? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
50. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event that lasts for a short period of time? (For example: "sneeze" is highly relevant to this question, because a sneeze is a very brief event. In contrast, "laughter" might be somewhat relevant, because laughter typically lasts less than a minute.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an event that lasts for a short period of time? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
51. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as caused by some clear preceding event, action, or situation? (For example: "spill" is highly relevant to this question, because spills are preceded by an event or action that causes the spill to occur. In contrast, "friendship" might be somewhat relevant, because friendships can develop without any identifiable cause.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as caused by some clear preceding event, action, or situation? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
52. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as likely to have consequences (cause other things to happen)? (For example: "invasion" is highly relevant to this question, because an invasion is likely to lead to other things happening. In contrast, "idea" might be somewhat relevant, because ideas sometimes have consequences.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as likely to have consequences (cause other things to happen)? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
53. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an activity or event that involves an interaction between people? (For example: "wedding" is highly relevant to this question, because weddings are events that involve many interactions between people. In contrast, "jog" might be somewhat relevant, because jogging may or may not involve interactions between people.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as an activity or event that involves an interaction between people? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
54. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as human or human-like intentions, plans, or goals? (For example: "lobbyist" is highly relevant to this question, because lobbyists have complex intentions, plans, and goals. In contrast, "toddler" might be somewhat relevant, because toddlers have very simple needs and goals.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as human or human-like intentions, plans, or goals? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
55. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a thing or action that people use to communicate? (For example: "conversation" is highly relevant to this question, because conversations are one method people use to communicate. In contrast, "pen" might be somewhat relevant, because pens are tools often used to communicate.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a thing or action that people use to communicate? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
56. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as related to your own view of yourself, a part of YOUR self-image? (For example: "honesty" is highly relevant to this question, because you probably see yourself as having honesty. In contrast, "motorist" might be somewhat relevant, because you likely drive but this may not be a key part of your self-image.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as related to your own view of yourself, a part of YOUR self-image? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
57. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a form of mental activity or a function of the mind? (For example: "thought" is highly relevant to this question, because thought is produced by mental activity. In contrast, "sport" might be somewhat relevant, because sports require a degree of purely mental effort.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as a form of mental activity or a function of the mind? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
58. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that could help or benefit you or others? (For example: "cure" is highly relevant to this question, because cures usually help or benefit many people. In contrast, "news" might be somewhat relevant, because news can provide information that helps people.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that could help or benefit you or others? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
59. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that could cause harm to you or others? (For example: "epidemic" is highly relevant to this question, because epidemics usually cause harm to many people. In contrast, "snow" might be somewhat relevant, because snow can sometimes be a danger.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that could cause harm to you or others? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
60. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that you find pleasant? (For example: "music" is highly relevant to this question, because most people find listing to music very pleasant. In contrast, "breeze" might be somewhat relevant, because a breeze can be pleasant when you're hot.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that you find pleasant? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
61. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that you find unpleasant? (For example: "flu" is highly relevant to this question, because having the flu is very unpleasant. In contrast, "dust" might be somewhat relevant, because dust can be somewhat unpleasant.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that you find unpleasant? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
62. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel happy? (For example: "love" is highly relevant to this question, because love is something that typically makes people feel very happy. In contrast, "lunch" might be somewhat relevant, because having lunch can be restful and fun.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel happy? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
63. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel sad? (For example: "death" is highly relevant to this question, because death is something that typically makes people feel very sad. In contrast, "rain" might be somewhat relevant, because rain can make a day seem gloomy.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel sad? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
64. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel angry? (For example: "disrespect" is highly relevant to this question, because disrespect is something that makes people feel very angry. In contrast, "chore" might be somewhat relevant, because chores can be annoying.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel angry? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
65. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel disgusted? (For example: "vomit" is highly relevant to this question, because vomit is something that makes people feel very disgusted. In contrast, "trash" might be somewhat relevant, because trash can be somewhat disgusting.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel disgusted? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
66. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel afraid? (For example: "danger" is highly relevant to this question, because danger is something that makes people feel afraid. In contrast, "thunder" might be somewhat relevant, because loud thunder can be somewhat scary.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel afraid? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
67. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel surprised? (For example: "shock" is highly relevant to this question, because a shock is something unexpected that makes you feel very surprised. In contrast, "doorbell" might be somewhat relevant, because a doorbell can be somewhat surprising.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel surprised? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
68. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that motivates you to do something? (For example: "duty" is highly relevant to this question, because duty is something that people feel they must do. In contrast, "picture" might be somewhat relevant, because a picture might give you an idea.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that motivates you to do something? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
69. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that would be hard for you to live without? (For example: "shelter" is highly relevant to this question, because shelter is absolutely necessary for safety and wellbeing. In contrast, "napkin" might be somewhat relevant, because life without napkins would be inconvenient.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that would be hard for you to live without? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
70. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that grabs your attention? (For example: "scream" is highly relevant to this question, because a scream is something that grabs your attention and is impossible to ignore. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because seeing a cat might cause you to watch what it does.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that grabs your attention? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
71. Tablet. "After staring at the place for a long time, he jumped across the middle of the bridge and looked left and right. There in the middle was a stone tablet on which was inscribed in regular, large letters: The Blessed Land of Flower-Fruit Mountain, The Cave Heaven of Water-Curtain Cave." To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel alert, activated, excited, or keyed up in either a positive or negative way? (For example: "rollercoaster" is highly relevant to this question, because riding a rollercoaster is an activity that is typically very arousing. In contrast, "radio" might be somewhat relevant, because listening to the radio can be interesting.) To what degree do you think of "tablet" as someone or something that makes you feel alert, activated, excited, or keyed up in either a positive or negative way? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
72. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as something that you can easily see? (For example: "moon" is highly relevant to this question, because the moon is a physical object you can easily see. In contrast, "disease" might be somewhat relevant, because disease is something that you may or may not be able to see.) To what degree do you think of "property" as something that you can easily see? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
73. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as visually light or bright? (For example: "snow" is highly relevant to this question, because snow is very bright. In contrast, "banana" might be somewhat relevant, because bananas have a somewhat light color.) To what degree do you think of "property" as visually light or bright? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
74. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as visually dark? (For example: "coal" is highly relevant to this question, because coal is very dark. In contrast, "mud" might be somewhat relevant, because mud has a somewhat dark color.) To what degree do you think of "property" as visually dark? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
75. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining color? (For example: "grass" is highly relevant to this question, because grass has a very characteristic color. In contrast, "pony" might be somewhat relevant, because the color of ponies is somewhat variable.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining color? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
76. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining visual texture or surface pattern? (For example: "tiger" is highly relevant to this question, because tigers have a very characteristic striped surface pattern. In contrast, "pond" might be somewhat relevant, because the surface of a pond has a subtle visual texture.) To help us confirm that you're reading the questions carefully, please select option 0 for this question. To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining visual texture or surface pattern? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
77. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining visual texture or surface pattern? (For example: "tiger" is highly relevant to this question, because tigers have a very characteristic striped surface pattern. In contrast, "pond" might be somewhat relevant, because the surface of a pond has a subtle visual texture.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining visual texture or surface pattern? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
78. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as large in size? (For example: "volcano" is highly relevant to this question, because volcanos are very large in size. In contrast, "camel" might be somewhat relevant, because camels are somewhat large in size.) To what degree do you think of "property" as large in size? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
79. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as small in size? (For example: "speck" is highly relevant to this question, because specks are very small in size. In contrast, "rabbit" might be somewhat relevant, because rabbits are somewhat small in size.) To what degree do you think of "property" as small in size? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
80. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a lot of visually observable movement? (For example: "tornado" is highly relevant to this question, because tornados show a lot of observable movement. In contrast, "clock" might be somewhat relevant, because clock parts move, but not very noticeably.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a lot of visually observable movement? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
81. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as movement like that of a living thing? (For example: "monkey" is highly relevant to this question, because monkeys show movements that are very typical of a living thing. In contrast, "snail" might be somewhat relevant, because snails are alive and move, but not like typical animals.) To what degree do you think of "property" as movement like that of a living thing? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
82. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as visible movement that is fast? (For example: "motorcycle" is highly relevant to this question, because motorcycles typically move very fast. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because cats sometimes move fast.) To what degree do you think of "property" as visible movement that is fast? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
83. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as visible movement that is slow? (For example: "snail" is highly relevant to this question, because snails typically move very slowly. In contrast, "cow" might be somewhat relevant, because cows usually move somewhat slowly.) To what degree do you think of "property" as visible movement that is slow? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
84. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining visual shape or form? (For example: "giraffe" is highly relevant to this question, because giraffes have a very characteristic visual shape. In contrast, "chocolate" might be somewhat relevant, because chocolate can come in a variety of shapes.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining visual shape or form? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
85. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as visually complex? (For example: "motorcycle" is highly relevant to this question, because motorcycles have many visually observable parts. In contrast, "skateboard" might be somewhat relevant, because skateboards have relatively few observable parts. ) To what degree do you think of "property" as visually complex? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
86. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a human or human-like face? (For example: "nurse" is highly relevant to this question, because nurses have human faces. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because cat and human faces share some similar features.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a human or human-like face? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
87. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as human or human-like body parts? (For example: "nurse" is highly relevant to this question, because nurses have human body parts. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because cats have some body parts that are similar to humans.) To what degree do you think of "property" as human or human-like body parts? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
88. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as something that you could easily recognize by touch? (For example: "toothbrush" is highly relevant to this question, because a toothbrush is something you can touch and recognize by feel. In contrast, "onion" might be somewhat relevant, because an onion might be a little hard to recognize by touch alone.) To what degree do you think of "property" as something that you could easily recognize by touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
89. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as something associated with temperature? (For example: "fire" is highly relevant to this question, because fire often evokes a strong sense of temperature. In contrast, "hamburger" might be somewhat relevant, because hamburgers are usually warm to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "property" as something associated with temperature? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
90. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as hot to the touch? (For example: "fire" is highly relevant to this question, because fire has a very hot temperature. In contrast, "hamburger" might be somewhat relevant, because hamburgers are usually warm to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "property" as hot to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
91. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as cold to the touch? (For example: "ice" is highly relevant to this question, because ice has a very cold temperature. In contrast, "knife" might be somewhat relevant, because knives are usually cool to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "property" as cold to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
92. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as something associated with tactile texture? (For example: "silk" is highly relevant to this question, because silk has a very soft and smooth texture. In contrast, "wood" might be somewhat relevant, because wood usually has a noticeable grain and surface texture to the touch.) To what degree do you think of "property" as something associated with tactile texture? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
93. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a smooth texture to the touch? (For example: "silk" is highly relevant to this question, because silk is very smooth to the touch. In contrast, "cardboard" might be somewhat relevant, because cardboard is fairly smooth.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a smooth texture to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
94. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a rough texture to the touch? (For example: "stubble" is highly relevant to this question, because beard stubble is very rough to the touch. In contrast, "brick" might be somewhat relevant, because the surface of a brick is fairly rough.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a rough texture to the touch? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
95. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as light in weight? (For example: "balloon" is highly relevant to this question, because toy balloons are very light in weight. In contrast, "apple" might be somewhat relevant, because apples are fairly light in weight.) To what degree do you think of "property" as light in weight? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
96. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as heavy in weight? (For example: "anvil" is highly relevant to this question, because anvils are very heavy in weight. In contrast, "bookcase" might be somewhat relevant, because bookcases are fairly heavy, but typically can be lifted with effort.) To what degree do you think of "property" as heavy in weight? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
97. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as pain or physical discomfort? (For example: "headache" is highly relevant to this question, because headaches are associated with a lot of pain and physical discomfort. In contrast, "pin" might be somewhat relevant, because a pin might accidentally cause pain.) To what degree do you think of "property" as pain or physical discomfort? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
98. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as something that you can easily hear? (For example: "siren" is highly relevant to this question, because sirens are easy to hear. In contrast, "stream" might be somewhat relevant, because streams make sounds but are somewhat difficult to hear.) To what degree do you think of "property" as something that you can easily hear? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
99. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a loud sound? (For example: "explosion" is highly relevant to this question, because explosions make very loud sounds. In contrast, "argument" might be somewhat relevant, because arguments can sometimes be loud.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a loud sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
100. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a low-pitched sound? (For example: "tuba" is highly relevant to this question, because tubas make very low sounds. In contrast, "cow" might be somewhat relevant, because cows make fairly low-pitched sounds.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a low-pitched sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
101. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a high-pitched sound? (For example: "whistle" is highly relevant to this question, because whistles make very high sounds. In contrast, "rooster" might be somewhat relevant, because roosters make fairly high-pitched sounds.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a high-pitched sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
102. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or recognizable sound or sounds? (For example: "rooster" is highly relevant to this question, because roosters make very recognizable sounds. In contrast, "truck" might be somewhat relevant, because trucks make somewhat recognizeable sounds.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or recognizable sound or sounds? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
103. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a musical sound? (For example: "orchestra" is highly relevant to this question, because orchestras make musical sounds. In contrast, "windchimes" might be somewhat relevant, because windchimes make a somewhat musical sound.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a musical sound? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
104. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that talks? (For example: "actress" is highly relevant to this question, because actresses very often talk. In contrast, "baby" might be somewhat relevant, because babies make babbling noises that sound similar to speech.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that talks? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
105. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining taste? (For example: "banana" is highly relevant to this question, because bananas have a very characteristic taste. In contrast, "potato" might be somewhat relevant, because potatoes have a subtle but recognizable taste.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining taste? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
106. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining smell or smells? (For example: "orange" is highly relevant to this question, because oranges have a very characteristic smell. In contrast, "dirt" might be somewhat relevant, because dirt has a subtle but recognizable smell.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a characteristic or defining smell or smells? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
107. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as actions using the face, mouth, or tongue? (For example: "whistle" is highly relevant to this question, because whistles are objects you use with your face and mouth. In contrast, "candle" might be somewhat relevant, because candles are things you sometimes blow out.) To what degree do you think of "property" as actions using the face, mouth, or tongue? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
108. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as actions using the arm, hand, or fingers? (For example: "keyboard" is highly relevant to this question, because keyboards are objects you use with your hands and fingers. In contrast, "shoe" might be somewhat relevant, because wearing shoes requires relatively little hand or arm involvement.) To what degree do you think of "property" as actions using the arm, hand, or fingers? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
109. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as actions using the leg or foot? (For example: "pedal" is highly relevant to this question, because pedals are objects you work with your leg and foot. In contrast, "elevator" might be somewhat relevant, because using an elevator requires only minimal leg and foot involvement.) To what degree do you think of "property" as actions using the leg or foot? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
110. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a physical object YOU have personal experience using? (For example: "fork" is highly relevant to this question, because forks are objects you likely have a lot of personal experience using. In contrast, "saw" might be somewhat relevant, because you probably have some experience using a saw.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a physical object YOU have personal experience using? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
111. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a fixed location, as on a map? (For example: "library" is highly relevant to this question, because libraries and other buildings have a very fixed location. In contrast, "bush" might be somewhat relevant, because bushes have a fixed location but are not distinctive enough to be marked on maps.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a fixed location, as on a map? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
112. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as changes in location along a particular direction or path? (For example: "rocket" is highly relevant to this question, because rockets follow a typical path upward into the sky. In contrast, "helicopter" might be somewhat relevant, because helicopters might move along various horizontal and vertical paths.) To what degree do you think of "property" as changes in location along a particular direction or path? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
113. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a particular setting or physical location? (For example: "oven" is highly relevant to this question, because thinking of an oven might bring to mind a kitchen. In contrast, "cup" might be somewhat relevant, because thinking of a cup might bring to mind a variety of different locations.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a particular setting or physical location? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
114. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as often physically near to you (within easy reach) in everyday life? (For example: "wristwatch" is highly relevant to this question, because your watch is physically very near to you in everyday life, assuming you wear a watch. In contrast, "pen" might be somewhat relevant, because you may have a pen near you when you work.) To what degree do you think of "property" as often physically near to you (within easy reach) in everyday life? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
115. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as movement toward or into you? (For example: "food" is highly relevant to this question, because food is something you typically bring toward and into you. In contrast, "cup" might be somewhat relevant, because a cup is something you typically bring toward you.) To what degree do you think of "property" as movement toward or into you? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
116. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as movement away from or out of you? (For example: "vomit" is highly relevant to this question, because vomit is something that comes out of and away from you. In contrast, "key" might be somewhat relevant, because a key is something you typically move away from you.) To what degree do you think of "property" as movement away from or out of you? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
117. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a specific number or amount? (For example: "week" is highly relevant to this question, because the word week indicates 7 days. In contrast, "glove" might be somewhat relevant, because the word glove might make you think of 5 fingers.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a specific number or amount? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
118. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as an event or occurrence that occurs at a typical or predictable time? (For example: "lunch" is highly relevant to this question, because lunch is an event that typically occurs around noon. In contrast, "holiday" might be somewhat relevant, because holidays occur on somewhat predictable dates.) To what degree do you think of "property" as an event or occurrence that occurs at a typical or predictable time? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
119. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as an event that has a predictable duration, whether short or long? (For example: "movie" is highly relevant to this question, because movies have a fairly standard duration. In contrast, "concert" might be somewhat relevant, because concerts are somewhat variable in duration.) To what degree do you think of "property" as an event that has a predictable duration, whether short or long? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
120. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as an event that lasts for a long period of time? (For example: "life" is highly relevant to this question, because peoples' lives typically last a long time. In contrast, "war" might be somewhat relevant, because wars often last for several years.) To what degree do you think of "property" as an event that lasts for a long period of time? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
121. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as an event that lasts for a short period of time? (For example: "sneeze" is highly relevant to this question, because a sneeze is a very brief event. In contrast, "laughter" might be somewhat relevant, because laughter typically lasts less than a minute.) To what degree do you think of "property" as an event that lasts for a short period of time? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
122. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as caused by some clear preceding event, action, or situation? (For example: "spill" is highly relevant to this question, because spills are preceded by an event or action that causes the spill to occur. In contrast, "friendship" might be somewhat relevant, because friendships can develop without any identifiable cause.) To help us confirm that you're reading the questions carefully, please select option 6 for this question. To what degree do you think of "property" as caused by some clear preceding event, action, or situation? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
123. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as caused by some clear preceding event, action, or situation? (For example: "spill" is highly relevant to this question, because spills are preceded by an event or action that causes the spill to occur. In contrast, "friendship" might be somewhat relevant, because friendships can develop without any identifiable cause.) To what degree do you think of "property" as caused by some clear preceding event, action, or situation? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
124. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as likely to have consequences (cause other things to happen)? (For example: "invasion" is highly relevant to this question, because an invasion is likely to lead to other things happening. In contrast, "idea" might be somewhat relevant, because ideas sometimes have consequences.) To what degree do you think of "property" as likely to have consequences (cause other things to happen)? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
125. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as an activity or event that involves an interaction between people? (For example: "wedding" is highly relevant to this question, because weddings are events that involve many interactions between people. In contrast, "jog" might be somewhat relevant, because jogging may or may not involve interactions between people.) To what degree do you think of "property" as an activity or event that involves an interaction between people? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
126. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as human or human-like intentions, plans, or goals? (For example: "lobbyist" is highly relevant to this question, because lobbyists have complex intentions, plans, and goals. In contrast, "toddler" might be somewhat relevant, because toddlers have very simple needs and goals.) To what degree do you think of "property" as human or human-like intentions, plans, or goals? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
127. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a thing or action that people use to communicate? (For example: "conversation" is highly relevant to this question, because conversations are one method people use to communicate. In contrast, "pen" might be somewhat relevant, because pens are tools often used to communicate.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a thing or action that people use to communicate? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
128. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as related to your own view of yourself, a part of YOUR self-image? (For example: "honesty" is highly relevant to this question, because you probably see yourself as having honesty. In contrast, "motorist" might be somewhat relevant, because you likely drive but this may not be a key part of your self-image.) To what degree do you think of "property" as related to your own view of yourself, a part of YOUR self-image? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
129. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as a form of mental activity or a function of the mind? (For example: "thought" is highly relevant to this question, because thought is produced by mental activity. In contrast, "sport" might be somewhat relevant, because sports require a degree of purely mental effort.) To what degree do you think of "property" as a form of mental activity or a function of the mind? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
130. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that could help or benefit you or others? (For example: "cure" is highly relevant to this question, because cures usually help or benefit many people. In contrast, "news" might be somewhat relevant, because news can provide information that helps people.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that could help or benefit you or others? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
131. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that could cause harm to you or others? (For example: "epidemic" is highly relevant to this question, because epidemics usually cause harm to many people. In contrast, "snow" might be somewhat relevant, because snow can sometimes be a danger.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that could cause harm to you or others? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
132. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that you find pleasant? (For example: "music" is highly relevant to this question, because most people find listing to music very pleasant. In contrast, "breeze" might be somewhat relevant, because a breeze can be pleasant when you're hot.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that you find pleasant? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
133. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that you find unpleasant? (For example: "flu" is highly relevant to this question, because having the flu is very unpleasant. In contrast, "dust" might be somewhat relevant, because dust can be somewhat unpleasant.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that you find unpleasant? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
134. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel happy? (For example: "love" is highly relevant to this question, because love is something that typically makes people feel very happy. In contrast, "lunch" might be somewhat relevant, because having lunch can be restful and fun.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel happy? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
135. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel sad? (For example: "death" is highly relevant to this question, because death is something that typically makes people feel very sad. In contrast, "rain" might be somewhat relevant, because rain can make a day seem gloomy.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel sad? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
136. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel angry? (For example: "disrespect" is highly relevant to this question, because disrespect is something that makes people feel very angry. In contrast, "chore" might be somewhat relevant, because chores can be annoying.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel angry? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
137. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel disgusted? (For example: "vomit" is highly relevant to this question, because vomit is something that makes people feel very disgusted. In contrast, "trash" might be somewhat relevant, because trash can be somewhat disgusting.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel disgusted? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
138. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel afraid? (For example: "danger" is highly relevant to this question, because danger is something that makes people feel afraid. In contrast, "thunder" might be somewhat relevant, because loud thunder can be somewhat scary.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel afraid? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
139. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel surprised? (For example: "shock" is highly relevant to this question, because a shock is something unexpected that makes you feel very surprised. In contrast, "doorbell" might be somewhat relevant, because a doorbell can be somewhat surprising.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel surprised? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
140. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that motivates you to do something? (For example: "duty" is highly relevant to this question, because duty is something that people feel they must do. In contrast, "picture" might be somewhat relevant, because a picture might give you an idea.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that motivates you to do something? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
141. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that would be hard for you to live without? (For example: "shelter" is highly relevant to this question, because shelter is absolutely necessary for safety and wellbeing. In contrast, "napkin" might be somewhat relevant, because life without napkins would be inconvenient.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that would be hard for you to live without? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
142. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that grabs your attention? (For example: "scream" is highly relevant to this question, because a scream is something that grabs your attention and is impossible to ignore. In contrast, "cat" might be somewhat relevant, because seeing a cat might cause you to watch what it does.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that grabs your attention? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
143. Property. "The other monkeys surrounded him and asked, 'How is it inside? How deep is the water?' The stone monkey replied, 'There isn't any water at all. There's a sheet iron bridge, and beyond it is a piece of Heaven-sent property.'" To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel alert, activated, excited, or keyed up in either a positive or negative way? (For example: "rollercoaster" is highly relevant to this question, because riding a rollercoaster is an activity that is typically very arousing. In contrast, "radio" might be somewhat relevant, because listening to the radio can be interesting.) To what degree do you think of "property" as someone or something that makes you feel alert, activated, excited, or keyed up in either a positive or negative way? (0 means low relevance, 6 means high relevance)
Not related
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
關(guān)閉
更多問卷
復(fù)制此問卷